Should People Get Media Training Before they use Twitter?

Over the past several years we have seen the PR field challenged as never before, and change, as tactics that outlived their usefulness were updated or fell by the wayside. I know this because I have lived and blogged about it – recall my PR Death Watch series of posts.

However a funny thing happened on the way to peace, love and social media understanding. Some picked their heads up and realized that: yes, traditional media still matters. And so do press releases (see Revenge of the Press Release).

And what about other conventions that may now seem quaint – like media training, and prepared statements?

In a world where everyone has a microphone, it does not take long before quite a few start to sound like those bores with the cringe-inducing speeches and wedding toasts.  I share below a couple examples by way of recent articles that prompted this post, with excerpts in italics:

Wall Street JournalCity Ballet A Twitter over Posts

New York City Ballet is set to become one of the country’s first major performing-arts companies to govern its employees’ posts on Twitter, Facebook and other social-media outlets.  And Devin Alberda, a member of the company’s corps de ballet, is part of the reason why.

After news of his boss’s drunk-driving arrest was made public, Mr. Alberda tweeted: “Thank goodness riding the subway while intoxicated isn’t a misdemeanor offense,” adding the hashtag “#dontfireme.” In another tweet, he mocked a character in a production…

New York TimesWhen the Marketing Reach of Social Media Backfires

…what happens when behavior on social media is deemed antisocial? Two large marketers, Aflac and the Chrysler Group, are struggling to answer that uncomfortable question in the wake of incidents that took place within days of each other. The incidents, involving remarks on Twitter that were judged to be tasteless, inappropriate and insensitive, point out some inherent risks of social media.

It is interesting, because the very formality of public speaking or a press interview would normally put most people on guard; but put them in front of Facebook and Twitter, and they just blurt, oblivious of the consequences.

You can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube, and I don’t think anyone wants an overly scripted world in which people need handlers to tweet. I do think some form of social media training is called for, and companies that haven’t done so already need to come up with and enforce reasonable social media policies.

People who tweet or blog on behalf of a company (or even if they are doing so independently, but their name is closely associated) should go through some basic training akin to media training to govern the ins and outs of social media. Some of the rules of the road may seem to be common sense, but there are many gray areas and pitfalls.

Posted in In the News, Marketing, PR, PR Tech | 1 Comment

How Times Reporters Use Twitter (A Cocktail Party with Journalists)

The Public Editor column in the New York Times shines a light on how the paper covers news and seeks  Silverbullet to help readers better understand the reasoning behind their stories and editing decisions.

This week, Public Editor Arthur Brisbane covered how some of the New York Times reporters use Twitter.

I found it to be ironic because, while reporters sometimes look down on PR (I am not saying the ones listed below do, I am speaking in general terms), their use of Twitter reminds us that they are not above a little self promotion and personal brand building.  Also, the article left me more convinced than ever that PR people who are not on Twitter are missing out in a major way, as Twitter is like a "cocktail party" between journalists and readers (to use the words in the title of the article).

Here is an excerpt:

...some Times writers and editors have become prolific at it, sending out thousands of tweets to thousands and, in some cases, hundreds of thousands of followers. For them, the online service, which allows you to transmit 140-character messages and links, has emerged as a vast medium of information exchange…By selecting a universe of tweeters to follow, they can track news sources of all kinds, including rival journalists. They can create listening posts across every topic they need to monitor.

Here are some of the takeaways (words in italics are excerpts):

Twitter helps journalists track news sources of all kinds

David Carr, media columnist for The Times… said Twitter frequently puts him ahead of the news curve: “Twitter is my default news feed.”

Twitter helps them sift through information

Patrick LaForge said that:

Other Twitter users “curate” the Web for him...“which means they find, analyze and comment on useful links that interest me far more quickly than I could ever do for myself…"  Mr. Carr said, “you can see what is getting heat and what is not.”

It Helps them Research Stories and Float Ideas

[Nicholas Kristof] said, he is planning a possible trip to Mauritania and has used Twitter to query his million-man follower group in search of expertise on the country — with good results… He has used it also for something that blogs and columns just aren’t appropriate for, he said: publishing a hunch.

Twitter helps reporters build their personal brands

Twitter also enables writers to super-publish their work… effectively pushing a cloud of links far beyond the reach of The Times’s Web site and print edition…. Down this path Times journalists go, not surprisingly, in search of a greater following. “Twitter does turn us all into marketers,” said Brian Stelter, who covers media issues.

Posted in PR Tech, Reading Files | Comments Off on How Times Reporters Use Twitter (A Cocktail Party with Journalists)

9 Common Press Release Errors and How to Avoid Them

This week B2Bbuzz featured an article that I wrote on how to make the best use of press releases in support of PR and marketing programs.

The press release has suffered an indentity crisis in recent years.  Some have questioned their continued relevance, and fail to use them to full advantage.

My article argues that press releases should remain an important part of the PR and marketing arsenal, and explains common errors and how to avoid them.  The errors fall into the categories below.

  1. Failing to Have a PR Strategy and Plan
  2. Issuing Too Few or Too Many
  3. Underestimating the Importance of the Press Release
  4. Overthinking press releases
  5. Striking the Wrong Tone
  6. Assuming it is Just About News Coverage
  7. To wire or not to wire
  8. Avoiding “Send and Pray” syndrome

If this is a subject that you are interested in, I urge you to visit the B2Bbuzz link and read the article.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Tracx Helps you Start Making Social Media Sense (and ROI Dollars)

One of the nice things about blogging is that people are constantly bringing to my attention things that they think will Monitoringpng (2)
interest my readers (please see my post Why I Like Getting Pitches).  This helps me discover new things.  Since I write about PR and social media, I am often approached about the latest gizmo or news that relates to these areas.

That is how I came across Tracx, and I am glad that they found me.

Social media can present tremendous challenges when it comes to making sense out of all the chatter, planning activities, and determining impact.  Tracx helps with these things in a better and more holistic way, when compared with other products I have seen.

The beautiful dashboard presents myriad charts and views in an easy-to-understand format, and lets you drill down, explore, plan and execute activities to your heart’s content.  It makes you fell like you are sitting in the cockpit of an F16 fighter jet, or the Pentagon war room.

I provide more details in my post on Social Fluency today, and urge you to check out Tracx.

Posted in PR Tech | Comments Off on Tracx Helps you Start Making Social Media Sense (and ROI Dollars)

Google Refresh is a Good Thing for PR, Social Media and the Web

Google was in the news this week for making significant adjustments to its search algorithm. Their move was an apparent response to all the outcry about high rankings for low quality content, which in turn has been driven by the growth of content farms and other attempts by many to game the search system.

I think this is a great move and should result in changes that benefit those who work in PR and social media, among others. I work hard to generate original content that I hope will be interesting to others, and is not  driven by what people are searching for at any given moment. So do the people I work with and our clients.

The growth of content syndication sites and content farms has led to a lot of noise and garbage that just gets in the way of things on the Web. Sure, there is some good content on these sites. But as anyone who tries to monitor topics and brands and wade through never-ending streams of Google alerts quickly realizes, there is a ton of redundancy and garbage. Even when you do find good articles, the syndication sites make it hard to understand the original source and date of the information.

The Wall Street Journal had a couple of stories this week on the topic.  Google Reorders Web Winners discussed likely winners and losers, and included the following quote from a Google spokesperson:

“people generating original content and maintaining high-quality websites” benefit Google.

Another article in the Journal introduced the termarticle vomit,”  which, amazingly, was coined by someone from one of the offending sites, who also pointed to changes that are forthcoming:

He added that authors will now be required to write a minimum of 400 words an article, up from 250 words, along with many other changes to improve quality.

Clearly, given Google’s influence, the changes will hopefully encourage longer and higher quality articles (and perhaps even stem an apparent decline in blogging, a topic that I wrote about in Builldog Reporter this week).

Posted in Tech, Tech PR, Web/Tech | Comments Off on Google Refresh is a Good Thing for PR, Social Media and the Web

Bulldog Reporter Piece on State of PR Blogging

A Pew Research study that was in the news last week concluded that youg people are spending less time on blogs and more time on Twitter and Facebook.  This has led to some questions about the state of blogging and what this means for people in the PR field.

In my article that is in Bulldog Reporter today, I explored this topic – in brief, I argued that blogging remains relevant; but those who are involved with PR and social media need to make sure that it is just one part of an integrated strategy.

What do you think?  I urge you to visit the link, read the article and participate in the discussion.

Posted in In the News, Marketing, PR Tech | Comments Off on Bulldog Reporter Piece on State of PR Blogging

Role of Publicists in the Oscar Chase; One Seat was Vacant

If you like movies and handicapping contests, there is no better time than Academy Award season.  And if you happen to be in PR, as I am, it is interesting to follow news reports about all the behind-the-scenes marketing, maneuvering and gamesmanship that is done to try to influence the outcomes.

I enjoyed the show last night – I thought the hosts did a great job, and the quality of movies that were up for awards seemed to be better in general this year.  I also enjoyed reading a couple of related articles in the New York Times.

The first article featured Times reviewer responses to reader questions about movies; one question, posed to Manohla Dargis, was about the Social Network vs. King's Speech – the answer highlighted the role of publicists and press in the Oscar race:

Q. What do you think accounts for the seismic shift from the total dominance of “The Social Network” on the awards circuit to “The King’s Speech” replacing it as the front-runner over the last few weeks?

MANOHLA DARGIS The idea that “The Social Network” was ever an authentic front-runner for best picture is a nice idea and a total media fabrication. Every year entertainment journalists, aided and abetted by movie publicists, try to spin some kind of drama out of what has become an interminable “awards season….”  Two easy ways to stir up interest and trouble are to locate a villain (as in late 2001, when nasty chatter about “A Beautiful Mind” oozed into the mainstream) or create a media-friendly slugfest, as with last year’s trivializing battle of the exes (Kathryn Bigelow versus James Cameron). With no obvious villains available this year the, er, reigning narrative is that “The King’s Speech” has unexpectedly emerged as the one to beat at the Oscars…

The second article ("The Missing Guest at the Oscar Party") sadly reminded us that Ronnie Chasen, a publicist who would normally be there and working the room, was not because she met an untimely death last year.

 

 

Posted in Campaign Analysis, Current Affairs, Events, PR, Reading Files | Comments Off on Role of Publicists in the Oscar Chase; One Seat was Vacant

6 Degrees of Celebrity Train Wreck / Charlie “Sheeny”

I like to focus on the positive stories, even though I know that it is sometimes negative ones that can get the most attention.  A lot of this has to do with my belief in Karma – I am, after all, in PR and what goes around can often come right back.

I will, however, make an exception with the news about Charlie Sheen’s rants to the news media.

In my opinion, Sheen wins the “Double D-bag” award – and the D in this case does not refer to breast size, although that would clearly appeal to him. The Ds in this case are single-syllable words, however I will leave out the specifics so as not to stray too far from the normally very civilized tone of this blog (OK, one of them is “dirt”).

My suspicions that he is a very unpleasant and sleazy person were confirmed with the latest news about his rants to the news media and the suspension of the show in the wake of yet another outrageous report about hooker and coke parties.

You can now add the label “anti-semite” too, as in his diatribes he went out of his way to goad the show’s (Two-and-a-half Men) creator, Chuck Lorre, who is Jewish, as reported in the New York Times yesterday:

…the actor assailed Mr. Lorre, calling him a “clown” and a “charlatan” whose “tin can” of a show Mr. Sheen said he had converted into “pure gold.”

For no apparent reason.. Mr. Sheen said Mr. Lorre’s real name is Chaim Levine. He was born Charles Levine; a Hebrew version would be Chaim. The comment struck executives at both CBS and Warner Brothers as anti-Semitic…

In response to the shutdown, Mr. Sheen sent a comment to TMZ. Again he attacked Mr. Lorre, saying, “What does this say about Haim Levine [Chuck Lorre] after he tried to use his words to judge and attempt to degrade me. I gracefully ignored this folly for 177 shows.” He added,“I urge all my beautiful and loyal fans who embraced this show for almost a decade to walk with me side-by-side as we march up the steps of justice to right this unconscionable wrong.”

Hmmm… while we are on the subject of not-so-subtle digs, perhaps we should take a closer look at Mr. Sheen… after all, his nose does look a little “semitic,” shall we say?   And Charlie – isn’t there a Jewish name that would fit, like Chaim?  And Sheen – short for Sheeny? Perhaps he is a self-hating Jew – naaa… porn stars and coke?? As my mom would say, “that is not a very Jewish thing to do”.

If I feel sorry for anyone, it is Sheen’s publcist, if he has one – good luck in rehabilitating his image.

There, I feel better already.

Posted in Current Affairs, Events | 2 Comments

Are You Tweeting to Me? I’m the Only One Here

The Middle East is on fire with revolution. As many news articles have documented, social media has played a key role, e.g. dissenters have used Facebook to organize and Twitter to have their voices heard. The governments in power have responded by trying to squelch the chatter.

The Internet was supposed to be this fault tolerant, decentralized system that is not easy to defeat – yet, as the recent New York Times article reported, the Egyptian government successfully located its “off switch.”

It seems that next arms race will be in cyberspace; Kelsey Judd recently wrote on the Fusion PR Forum blog about speak2tweet.

After the Egyptian government cut off the country’s Internet access, the companies Google, Twitter, and SayNow (Google’s newly acquired social-media-voice company) found a way to help the people by creating speak2tweet. It’s a cool new service that allows people to call a phone number with a message that is posted to Twitter.  The alternative service is not restricted to the normal limit of 140 characters.   Egyptian protestors used this as a tool to express their outrage and bring to light injustice… This is revolutionary because it allows people to tweet without the Internet; all they need is a voice connection.

Regarding Twitter and speech integration, there is a related story that is more about road warriors than revolutionaries.  Time Magazine wrote this week about new social media apps for car dashboards One example cited is Ford’s AppLink:

Then there’s Ford’s AppLink, a new feature of the manufacturer’s Sync infotainment system. A conceptual cousin of Entune, AppLink lets creators of apps for Android, BlackBerry, and iPhone handsets build software that uses Sync’s display and speech capabilities rather than inducing you to futz with your phone when your eyes should be on the road… OpenBeak.. lets you listen to your Twitter feed using Sync’s speech-synthesis feature.

 

Posted in In the News, PR Tech | Comments Off on Are You Tweeting to Me? I’m the Only One Here

As the Media Turns: Has Apple Bulldozed One Deal Too Many?

It is one of those truisms that is especially relevant in the PR world: don’t pick fights with those who buy ink by the barrel. While in most cases it is electrons that are at stake these days, the principle is the same – and one that seems to be lost on Apple.

Using the same approach and sharp elbows that worked so well in music and smart phones, and in an apparent attempt to convince yet another distressed industry that rising tides of coolness and brand can lift all ships, Apple is playing hardball with publishers and media companies.

I am talking, of course, about Apple’s efforts to find a mutually agreeable model for monetizing content from publishers, and this week’s chapter, in which the company announced the launch of subscriptions on its App Store.  If the move was meant to appease the industry – which had complained about lack of support for subscription pricing – this has not worked, judging by the headlines.

Let’s not forget, these are media companies, which all have pretty big megaphones, of course. These are the downtrodden left-behinds of the digital era, a group that has the sympathy of the public and vaunted principles of the Fourth Estate (and its status as a special and protected institution) behind them.

If Apple is helping them find a way out and show a way forward with new content platforms and monetization gambits, it is on their terms.

Did they make their latest move because they want to respond to industry conerns, or is it because others like Google are cozying up to publishers with better deals? Probably a little of both, see this post Clash of the Tech Titans: Google One Pass vs. Apple.

I have started to see some negative articles about a vendor that has always been a media darling (what a tortured relationship, this morning an NBC Today newscaster discussed possible government antitrust action Apple and almost in the same breath gushed about an Apple store coming to Grand Central Station).

Yesterday’s Wall street journal article Apple Risks an iPad Backlash said:

By playing hardball with media companies on App Store subscriptions, Apple risks a painful rebound. Few media outlets can afford to not have their mobile applications available through Apple’s App Store. With the iPad, Apple has an early lead in tablets, with a 75.3% share of global tablet shipments in the fourth quarter, Strategy Analytics estimates. And while its share of smartphone shipments was only 16.1%, the iPhone is the phone of choice for many affluent consumers. But that hardly justifies Apple’s terms for subscriptions sold within its App Store. The company will keep 30% of the revenues and won’t automatically give publishers information about their subscribers.

Yesterday, TechCrunch ran a post Why are You Defending Apple? It said:

As you’ve doubtless heard by now, yesterday Apple revealed its new fee structure for premium content: all apps that offer premium content outside of the App Store have to also offer it via Apple’s official in-app purchases (this includes Amazon’s Kindle) and Apple takes a 30% cut of all subscriptions…

My reaction has been one of trepidation. I don’t like where this is headed, and I think that many who consider themselves technophiles are completely dropping the ball by rationalizing what Apple has done……

I don’t like the precedents that Apple continues to set. The App Store has existed for less than three years, and Apple has been drastically changing the rules on the fly…

I don’t take issue with Apple demanding a small processing fee to handle credit card transactions, but 30% is too much, especially combined with the restriction that publishers can’t change their pricing to adjust to the tax. Not every business will be able to offset the decrease in margins with the increased purchase volume promised by one-click payments. And companies that are in the business of reselling premium content with fixed costs, like MOG or Amazon, don’t have many options… The App Store isn’t a storefront in the way that Amazon.com or Walmart are – this isn’t just an extravagant affiliate fee. We’re talking about the primary method of app distribution for one of the most important computer operating systems, ever.

Posted in In the News, Tech | Comments Off on As the Media Turns: Has Apple Bulldozed One Deal Too Many?