SMR: The Press Release Sheds its Suit Jacket and Puts on its Dancing Shoes

The press release just wants to be loved, and many in the PR profession will just not let go.

The press release is square.  It is corporate.  It is not fun, does not play well with others nor is it Web 2.0 “cool”.  So let’s dress up the release and give it a makeover.
And thus was born the SMR (social media release).
Some very creative thinking has gone into this and I offer kudos for those who invented it and are driving continued innovation (see this Emergence Media blog link that describes SMR evolution, and references Todd Defrens / SHIFT’s, Edelman’s, Solis’ et al work).
However, despite some recent traction (see my last post) I must say I am still not convinced that we should be spending lots of cycles (read: emotional and billable energy) on the whole idea.  It smacks too much of novelty, of PR trying to justify its continued existence.
It focuses too much attention on the wrapper and not the information.
Even with its 2.0 baubles and bangles it screams “party line” and “now a word from our sponsors” because it is still a press release if by any other name.
It is ephemeral  – not built from existing constructs nor designed to be a persistent Web destination like a blog, Wiki or general website.  So I question whether it can serve as an effective locus for discussion and continued engagement.
It turns the press release into a home science research project which requires a user’s manual and extensive work in setting up, making it harder to be nimble in communicating.
Look, we as communications professionals should be using the right tools for the right audiences. And we need to make sure these tools are in synch with the times.
Online audiences tend to be allergic to marketing and formality.  The press release is is by definition the party line.  And fast, informal, and transparent (meaning tied to some genuine voice and not a faceless corporate entity) are the calling cards of the new era in communications.

On the other hand, some believe that if info is not packaged as a press release it is not news.  Some – e.g. investors and industry watchers – do want to stay tuned to the latest happenings at companies and in industry, and if the press release is an accepted (if tired) construct for this, so be it.

Note that I am not tying myself up in knots like others do alternately attacking the release, apologizing for the poor and cliched writing often found in releases, or using these points to justify the invention of a new style of release.
There is nothing inherently wrong with the press release as it was intended – a wrapper for information aimed at, yes, audiences.
If the press release lives on in its traditional form or is reborn as an SMR, the same people will grouse about them, tear them apart and criticize the format and content.
So, when it comes to communicating with traditional media I say continue to hone the release format but don’t focus on the format. Make sure your content can be easily found and indexed by the search engines.  Sure, include links, why not, and Digg buttons and bookmarks.  Call it an SMR if you want and if you think it will give your agency or campaign extra juice.
When it comes to the wild and woolly blogosphere, you are best advised to communicate in your own voice.  Use blogs and wikis and keep it real.  Engage in a focused, targeted and one-on-one way whenever possible.
Focus your PR time and attention on being as agile as we find we need to be these days, active in listening and engaging – itself no easy task.
Yeah, I know it is not either / or – you can in theory have your SMR cake and eat up other means of communicating as well.
But embellishing the press release – an artifact that is becoming less and less useful as a carrier for weighty and deep info – interferes with the Fast part.
Continued focus on the SMR as being emblematic of where PR is going does not build on PR’s main strengths compared with other forms of marketing and communications, like advertising.
We have always been about content, about conversations, issues and engagement.
We should not be so focused on broadcasting info with glitzy Web 2.0 billboards (sure, we can handle that) but rather on communicating using the preferred tools and tenor of the day (Marty Weintraub said “Blogs are the New PR” in his post PR Power Blogging Zen), on speaking in a genuine voice tied to an individual, informality, transparency, and most of all engaging, taking the time to discover and get into and understand where your target audiences are, and what they are saying.
Posted in PR Tech | Comments Off on SMR: The Press Release Sheds its Suit Jacket and Puts on its Dancing Shoes

Social Media Release: Taking the Pulse

There’s been lots of new buzz over the past month or so about the social media release, much of it in response to Cisco’s implementation (see Cisco Social Media Release, on WebProNews).

Despite the misgivings I have expressed, in this blog and on Fusion Forum (see Web 2.0 Press Release: an Oxymoron?), I have decided that perhaps it is time for a fresh look.

I’ll be evaluating where the SMR stands today, by taking the pulse of online discussions, and, if possible, trying to look beyond the small number of case studies that I am aware of.

Meanwhile, I have updated my news radar, please see the column to the left for the latest links and buzz on the social media release.

I welcome your comments, especially any observations about where the SMR has or hasn’t been effective.

Thanks for reading.

Posted in PR Tech | Comments Off on Social Media Release: Taking the Pulse

Social Media Impact on Tech Journalism Report, SMR Revisited

The full details of the recent survey are now available at the Fusion Forum blog.

It includes a write-up on the results, methods, survey questions, and a link to the actual survey data on Survey Monkey.

One thing we regrettably did not query journalists on was their views on social media releases (having said that, respondents had ample opportunity to mention this in the free form comments sections and none did).

Indeed, an article in CNN Money just yesterday (Web 2.0 Reinvents the Press Release) seems to breathe new life into the concept of a Web 2.0 press release.  It cites the success of PRWeb in getting the word out online over larger rivals like PR Newswire and Businesswire, and attributes this to their use of SEO techniques and a Web 2.0 friendly / integrated approach.

I have in general been skeptical on the concept of a social media release (see my post Web 2.0 Press Release: An Oxymoron?)

However, perhaps it merits further consideration.  I’d love to hear your thoughts.  I’ll be blogging more about this in the coming days and weeks.

Posted in Web 2.0 | Comments Off on Social Media Impact on Tech Journalism Report, SMR Revisited

Business 2.0 – Looking at the (Tech PR) Bright side

Suzanne McGee has a great post on the Fusion Forum Blog, Pulp to Pulp – Time Inc. Shutters Business 2.0. It made me think fondly back on the go-go tech years of not too long ago.

It is sad that Business 2.0 is going away.   Looking on the bright side, I read in the NY Times (Time Inc. to Close Business 2.0) that 10 staffers, including editor Josh Quittner, will be moving to Fortune, to help bolster their tech coverage.

Also, let’s not
forget there is a new print business publication called Folio from Conde
Nast.

Although it is not a new economy publication, they do at least
some tech, Kevin Manes (formerly of USA Today) is a
contributor.
Posted in Tech PR | Comments Off on Business 2.0 – Looking at the (Tech PR) Bright side

Rumors of Tech Journalism Demise Exaggerated – See My Bulldog Reporter Editorial

I contributed an editorial to the Barks & Bites column of Bulldog Reporter.  It states my thoughts on the results of the now (in)famous survey about the impact of social media.

You can read more about it here.

Posted in Tech PR | 2 Comments

A Modest RSS Proposal

Well, I am back after a relaxing week in the Outer Banks, a beautiful spit of land just off the coast of North Carolina.  It had great beaches, crashing waves and seemed to be one of the few places in the U.S. that did not take a weather pounding last week.

Anyway, I further pondered the question from my last post: why the slim adoption of RSS among tech journalists?

Could it be at least partly because PR professionals have not jumped on the RSS bandwagon, and are not using RSS to disseminate PR materials to any great degree?

Sounds ridiculous, yet one of the findings of the survey was that an incredible 67% of the surveyed journalists ranked "PR contacts" as a top 3 method for researching articles – behind Google / Yahoo! (76%) and company websites (69%), yet ahead of "other articles" (52%).

First, it is great to know that they are actually listening.  Second, this led me to wonder whether our choices in how we communicate influence how others "listen."

Food for thought.   Sounds like we may need another survey of the PR side.

If you want to read more about my thoughts on RSS and PR, please see my post RSS: Read "Stop Stalling"

Posted in PR Tech | Comments Off on A Modest RSS Proposal

Is RSS Usage Overstated?

A bit ironic isn’t it?  We did not find as much uptake for RSS among tech journalists that we surveyed as we had expected (see yesterday’s post Social Media Impact on Tech Journalism, and the survey summary on the Fusion PR Forum).

In brief, RSS was ranked by the journalists we surveyed as among the least popular ways to receive news and info.  You would think RSS would be wildly popular in information-driven professions like tech journalism (unfortunately, I get the sense that my fellow PR professionals have not jumped on the RSS bandwagon in droves yet either).

Yet Computerworld reported yesterday the results of a Forrester survey: RSS Tops List of Web 2.0 Tools.  True, their survey was of IT managers, not end users of technology.  Still, you would think the results would not be at such odds.

Posted in PR Tech | 2 Comments

Social Media Impact on Tech Journalism

Some have said that social media like blogs,
Wikis and RSS pose a threat to traditional
journalists and publications, especially in the tech sector. 

For example, an article in Forbes (see "Tech Boom, Media
Bust
")
reported that tech media is reeling because of blogs.  SlashDot’s
ensuing post was the focus of much heated debate, both online and off.

At Fusion
PR, we wanted to go beyond the simple storyline and heated debate and find out
specifically how social media is changing traditional tech journalism, amidst some very obvious trends – the growth of blogging, the
shrinking or print media, and surge in online advertising and traffic. 

So we launched a survey of tech journalists last month.   Our goal in conducting this anonymous survey was to find out directly from actual
journalists how their jobs have changed since the advent and rapid ascent of
new and social media.

We wanted to determine to what extent traditional media are taking advantage of social media tools. Has this changed how they research, write
and deliver their stories, and follow the technologies they cover?

The hope was to get a better understanding of the
profession, leading to better ways of communicating with our journalist contacts.

You can find out more about the results by visiting the Fusion blog today.

 

Posted in Tech PR | Comments Off on Social Media Impact on Tech Journalism

Friendships and Technology, for Better and Often Worse

In my post Antisocial Networking I mentioned that I was getting a ton of invitations to social networking sites and joked that “before long we will all be one big writhing mass of social networkers,
spending countless hours doing whatever people do on these sites” due to peer pressure.

My post implied in a light hearted way that technology was changing the definition of “friend.”  Since then, some have come out and said in a more serious way that technology really is changing the nature of friendships.

In MediaPost Online Spin, Max Kalehoff had an interesting take on the subject in his article Please, No More Friends.  He wrote: “We’re experiencing friends overload, and it’s a tragedy of the commons.
The practice of friending has morphed way beyond the term’s original
intention and utility. And that is why I declare friends – at least in
the social-networking context – passé…

Let me be clear: Social networks are very much alive and well, but our
traditional, generalized notion of friend is dead. When online
friendships begin to scale artificially – such as randomly or via the
all-too-easy click of a button – they run the risk of overwhelming us,
causing the aggregate value of deeper social-network friendships to
erode.”

A little depressing (and overblown, in my opinion) but perhaps he is onto something.

Social networking friendship creep (a trend, not a person you want to avoid) is a more visible example of technology’s potential for altering how we relate to each other, and who we call friends.

The NY Times described how cell phone “friend and family” calling plans are doing much the same, in Saturday’s article What’s Good for Business Can be Hard on Friends:

“A month ago, Brandy McDowell sat down with her longtime friend, Kezia
Chandler, and told her she had switched cellphone carriers. Their
relationship has not been the same since. Now, they barely speak…

Maybe they should blame the cellphone carriers. The
carriers, after all, set up plans that encourage subscribers to talk
mainly to people in the same network. The companies say they are simply
trying to recruit and retain customers. It’s not surprising to find this out, considering the amount of competition there is in the industry these days. You can see that from these interesting cell phone statistics here.

But what was set up as
a purely business strategy is having an unintentional social effect. It
is dividing the people who share informal bonds and bringing together
those who have formal networks of cellphone ‘friends.'”

Posted in PR Tech | Comments Off on Friendships and Technology, for Better and Often Worse

I am in PR. Why should I Blog?

So if you are in PR, why do you need to blog?

I’ll spare you all my rantings about new times calling for new communications measures (if you are new to this blog, here are a few representative links A Publication of One and The Web 2.0 Press Release: An Oxymoron?; also, you can see the PR Tech category of this blog).

If you are in tech PR, you might also want to refer to the following Forbes article Tech Boom, Media Bust and ensuing SlashDot post Blogs are Eating Tech Media Alive and commentary.  Without getting into too much detail – the article warrants a dedicated post – suffice it to say that blogging, or at least factoring blogs into the communications mix could be a matter of survival and not just a good idea.

No, the reasons are more basic.  I contend that whether your focus is traditional PR aimed at MSM or the new PR  you should develop effective blogging skills.

This is why:

Being a good blogger means writing in a way that attracts attention and engages people. It means communicating well.

This skill is of course vital for any kind of media relations.

It means tracking the hot issues

No one wants to read a blog that hashes over last week’s news.  Staying-up-to-date is also key in PR, especially in fast moving sectors like tech and B2B.

It means knowing what you are talking about

No one wants to read a blog that is misinformed or full of hot air.

It means coming up with interesting concepts

Sure, many blogs comment on existing news and content, however if you can’t add an interesting perspective and/or occasionally come up with original ideas, you will probably not draw much of a following.

In short, blogging well means communicating well, being up-to-date, interesting and relevant.

Does developing good blogging skills mean that you need to be an A lister in the first year?  Not at all, God knows I am not.  See this inspirational post from Ben’s Brain – You Don’t Need to be an A List Blogger to be an A List Blogger. But aspiring to be a good blogger forces you to hone the above skills.

If you are in PR and don’t think these skills are important, you might as well look for another gig or be content to be just another hack in the business.

Posted in PR Tech | 2 Comments